VisualConvert vs Squoosh

Both are private, in-browser tools built by people who care about your data. They excel at different things.

Squoosh, made by Google, is an excellent single-image optimizer with deep, side-by-side codec controls — perfect when you want to hand-tune one image and compare formats pixel-for-pixel. Like VisualConvert, it processes everything locally in your browser.

VisualConvert is built for throughput: batch-convert many images at once, download them as a ZIP, convert images to PDF, target an exact file size, and optionally save Pro across devices with an account. If you need to process lots of files quickly, that workflow difference matters.

VisualConvert vs Squoosh at a glance

FeatureVisualConvertSquoosh
Files uploaded to a serverNo — 100% localNo — 100% local
Batch conversionYes (many files, ZIP)One image at a time
Exact-size (KB) targetingYesManual via quality slider
Image to PDFYesNo
Per-codec fine-tuningQuality sliderDeep, advanced controls
Accounts / cross-device ProYes (optional)No
PriceFree (Pro optional)Free

Why people switch to VisualConvert

  • True batch processing with one-click ZIP download.
  • Convert images straight to a PDF document.
  • Target an exact file size in KB automatically.
  • Optional account keeps Pro on all your devices.

The verdict

Choose Squoosh to meticulously optimize a single image with advanced codec settings and visual comparison.

Choose VisualConvert when you need to convert or compress many images at once, make PDFs, or hit an exact size target.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Squoosh private like VisualConvert?

Yes — Squoosh also runs locally in your browser. The main difference is workflow: Squoosh tunes one image; VisualConvert handles batches, PDF and exact-size targets.

Which is better for many images?

VisualConvert, thanks to batch conversion and ZIP download. Squoosh is designed for one image at a time.

Does Squoosh make PDFs?

No. VisualConvert can combine images into a PDF; Squoosh focuses purely on image optimization.